In the aftermath of Britain’s exit from the European Union, commonly known as Brexit, the flow of data has become a complex dance. It requires the harmonization of privacy laws between the EU’s GDPR and the UK’s GDPR, which came into effect after Brexit, as well as other third-country privacy legislations. But now the processors and controllers find themselves in a unique situation, where they are riding a unicycle of ensuring data privacy while also juggling multiple privacy frameworks, often overlapping and evolving each day. 

EU → UK Transfers: The Grace – and Fragility – of Adequacy

On 28th June 2021, the EU granted adequacy to the UK, allowing the free flow of data between Europe to Britain without any added contractual obligations. Upon leaving the European Union, the United Kingdom assumed the status of a “third country” under EU law. As a result, the European Commission must periodically evaluate whether the UK’s data protection laws and enforcement mechanisms continue to offer a level of protection for EU citizens’ data that is essentially equivalent to that provided under the EU GDPR. 

A point to note here is that this permission is not perpetual rather subject to revision. This extension provides temporary stability, but the EU isn’t blind to change. Civil society groups warn that legislative divergence, such as the UK's emerging Data Use &  Access Bill, could jeopardize adequacy. It raises a poignant tension: trust frameworks are not eternal licenses but fragile constructs subject to political shifts and legal reforms.

A solution that can be raised in such scenarios can be that the EU enctities should prepare for a dynamic scenario they must be ready to deal with both adequacy and also with potential non-adequacy scenarios, where free data flow halts, and fallback tools such as the Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) or Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) become necessary.

2. UK→ EU Transfers: Symmetry with Subtlescapes

The UK reciprocates by recognizing the EU/EEA adequacy, allowing British entities to send personal data to Europe freely.On the surface, this seems symmetrical, but nuance abounds. UK GDPR requires businesses to conduct a Transfer Risk Assessment (TRA) for transfers, even to “adequate” jurisdictions, and document their decision-making. While the EU GDPR does not mandate TRA to this extent, the UK’s explicit expectation adds procedural rigor. This safeguard implies that UK-to-EU data flows function smoothly, but they carry procedural baggage not always mirrored across the Channel. Organizations must treat adequacy as more than a tick-box—it’s a discipline.

3. UK ↔ Third Countries: The Role of IDTA & Addendum

Beyond the safety net of adequacy, the UK GDPR charts its course. Since March 21, 2022, UK-based data exporters have had two main tools with themselves for sending personal data to countries without adequacy decisions: the International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA) or the UK Addendum to the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs).

These mechanisms aren’t just legal checkboxes; they build on the post-Schrems II landscape, requiring data exporters to conduct a Transfer Risk Assessment (TRA) and ensure the transfer aligns with Article 46 of the UK GDPR.

For organizations outside the UK that receive such data, the responsibility doesn’t end with signing a document. They must also take a closer look at their own compliance measures to ensure that the IDTA or Addendum is not only used but backed by a well-considered TRA.

4. Third Countries → EU Transfers: Upholding the Moral Compass

Data from EU citizens sent to third countries is governed by EU GDPR. In the absence of adequacy, appropriate safeguards—new SCCs, BCRs, approved codes are mandatory. Operators straddling the EU, UK, and third countries face a veritable labyrinth. They must ensure:

• Dual-legality—compliance with both EU and UK regimes,
• Layered documentation, and
• Coherent data subject rights enforcement across all jurisdictions.

Why This Matters

Brexit did more than redraw political maps; it disrupted trust infrastructure. Data controllers and processors must proactively monitor adequacy timelines, implement robust contractual tools, and build a culture of transfer risk assessments.

This is not about bureaucratic burden; it’s a question of maintaining trust in borderless data relationships. From AI analytics firms to HR platforms, compliance comes at the speed of policy.

What Needs to Be Done  

1. Due Diligence: Regularly audit all data transfer mechanisms.
   
   
2. Documentation & TRAs: Maintain auditable workflows for both adequacy-based and safeguarded transfers.
3. Safeguard Selection: Apply IDTA, Addendum, SCCs, or BCRs meaningfully—not as formalities.
4. Ongoing Monitoring: Track UK & EU legal reforms (e.g., DUA Bill, Data Use & Access) for divergence risks  
5. Internal Alignment: Harmonize data-transfer practices across legal, compliance, and IT teams.
6. Privacy by Design: Integrate transfer compliance into technical architecture—making it part of UX, not an afterthought.
   
   

Conclusion: The Art of Ethical Data Flow

Cross-border transfers post-Brexit echo a delicate choreography. For organizations, it is a stark reminder that legal adequacy is not a permanent peace but a temporary truce. Navigating this new terrain calls for more than routine alerts and compliance checklists; it demands ethos, foresight, and a disciplined approach to governance.

Data is not just currency; it is a covenant. A quiet contract of trust between individuals and the platforms they interact with. In this evolving ecosystem, compliance becomes the choreography, and privacy, the art. Only those who can hold both perspectives in balance will truly thrive in today’s complex data economy.

CTA

Are you ready to master cross-border data transfers and build resilient GDPR-compliant systems? Dive into CourseKonnect’s Advanced Privacy Management track and move beyond compliance into cultural capability.

References

1. IAPP (2024). European Commission proposes UK adequacy deadline extension.https://iapp.org/news/a/european-commission-proposes-uk-adequacy-deadline-extension
2. European Commission. Adequacy Decisions under the GDPR: International Dimension of Data Protection.https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/international-dimension-data-protection/adequacy-decisions_en
3. ICO (UK Information Commissioner’s Office). Transfer Risk Assessments – Guidance for Organisations.https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/international-transfers/international-data-transfer-agreement-and-guidance/transfer-risk-assessments
4. European Commission (2024). Extension of the UK Data Adequacy Decision – Official Document (PDF).Download PDF
5. Computer Weekly (2024). European Commission should rescind UK data adequacy, say privacy advocates.https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366625354/European-Commission-should-rescind-UK-data-adequacy
6. ICO. International Transfers: A Guide for Organisations under the UK GDPR.https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/international-transfers/international-transfers-a-guide

By Shashank Pathak