Skip to Content

Balancing Data Subject Rights in the Age of Blockchain

How Companies Can Embrace Innovation Without Breaking Trust or Compliance

The rise of blockchain technology is transforming industries — from finance and healthcare to supply chains and data security. But with innovation comes complexity, especially when it comes to Data Subject Rights (DSRs). Can companies truly honor privacy rights like deletion or correction in a system designed to be permanent and tamper-proof?

The short answer? Yes — but only if they design smartly, communicate clearly, and blend privacy engineering with transparency.

Let’s break it down. 

First, What Are Data Subject Rights (DSRs)?


Under regulations like the GDPR, DPDPA (India), and CCPA, individuals — known as data subjects — have certain rights over their personal data. These include:

  • Right to Access – See what data is being stored and how it’s used
  • Right to Rectification – Correct any inaccurate or outdated information
  • Right to Erasure (Right to Be Forgotten) – Request deletion of personal data
  • Right to Restrict Processing – Limit how their data is used
  • Right to Data Portability – Transfer data from one service to another
  • Right to Object – Say “no” to certain uses of their data
  • Right Not to Be Subject to Automated Decisions – Avoid fully AI-driven outcomes without human input

So… What’s the Problem with Blockchain?

Blockchain is built on three key principles:

  • Immutability (once written, data cannot be changed or deleted)
  • Decentralization (data is distributed across many nodes)
  • Transparency (all participants can verify entries)

Sounds great, right? But here's the catch — once data is on a blockchain, you can't modify or delete it. And that directly conflicts with DSRs like the right to erasure or correction.

This leads to a privacy paradox:

“How can we give people control over their data… when we can't change or delete it?”

So How Do We Balance Blockchain with DSRs?


1. Avoid Putting Personal Data On-Chain

Keep personal data in traditional databases (off-chain) and use the blockchain only to store:

  • Hashes (digital fingerprints of data)
  • Unique identifiers
  • Timestamps or proof-of-consent

This way, if someone asks for deletion or correction, you can modify the off-chain record — no blockchain conflict.

2. Use Encryption + Key Destruction

When on-chain storage is absolutely necessary:

  • Encrypt personal data before storing it
  • If a user requests deletion, destroy the encryption key
  • The data becomes unreadable — essentially “forgotten,” even if still technically present

This is called "crypto-shredding."

3. Design Privacy-Friendly Smart Contracts

Smart contracts can:

  • Log consent updates
  • Execute off-chain deletion actions
  • Keep a record of DSR fulfillment (without exposing personal data)

This builds transparency and auditability into the system — great for trust and compliance.

4. Practice Data Minimization and Pseudonymization

Only collect what’s necessary — and anonymize or pseudonymize where possible. If you store only pseudonyms or hashed data, DSR obligations become more manageable and less risky.

5. Be Transparent About Limitations

If blockchain’s technical design prevents full deletion, be upfront. Explain:

  • What’s stored on-chain vs off-chain
  • Which DSRs can be fully honored
  • Any legal basis for data retention (e.g. audit trails)

Clear communication builds trust — and reduces regulatory risk.

Real Talk: Privacy + Blockchain = Creative Engineering

It’s not about choosing between innovation and compliance. It’s about designing systems that do both.

  • Blockchain is not anti-privacy — but it requires privacy by design.
  • Regulators are starting to recognize the uniqueness of blockchain systems — but you still have to show good faith efforts toward data protection.
  • The key is to embed privacy as a core design principle, not an afterthought.


Final Thoughts: Building the Best of Both Worlds

If your company is starting to explore or implement blockchain-based solutions, here’s the playbook:

  1. Architect systems that separate identity from immutable records
  2. Give users true visibility and control over the data that can be changed
  3. Use smart contracts not just for efficiency, but for privacy enforcement
  4. Collaborate with legal, tech, and compliance teams early in the process

By doing this, you can offer trustworthy innovation — a rare but powerful combination.


By CourseKonnect | Powered by CKonnect

Balancing Data Subject Rights in the Age of Blockchain
CKonnect 17 May 2025
Share this post
Archive
Blockchain V. Privacy laws: Can they Really Coexist?
"How Blockchain’s Immutability Impacts Data Subject Rights Under GDPR and Global Privacy Laws—and What Organizations Can Do to Stay Compliant.